Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Trash cans dumped for sun-powered compactors



Updated 3/29/2010 11:55 AM | Comments 9 | Recommend 5

A growing number of cities and municipalities are testing solar-powered trash compactors as a way to go green and save some green.

Communities in 46 states, as well as some state parks and colleges, are replacing regular trash cans, according to Richard Kennelly, vice president of BigBelly Solar marketing, which manufactures the devices.

Officials in states including California, Arizona and Pennsylvania say the trash compactors save long-term costs by reducing the number of trash pickups.

Powered by a solar panel, the compactor holds up to 32 gallons of compacted trash.

The newer models can send text messages to a central server when the cans are full to "minimize miles" in the trash pickup route, Kennelly says.

The cost of the cans varies. New York City Council member Erik Martin Dilan spent $4,000 of the council discretionary fund for one bin currently in the Bushwick section of Brooklyn, said his chief of staff, Rafael Espinal.

Philadelphia spent about $3,700 to purchase each compactor and $800 for recycling cans, Streets Commissioner Clarina Tollson says.

Pasadena, California, has deployed 12 of the containers over the past two years and bought 40 more in November that will be put in place this year, says Gabriel Silva, public works environmental program manager.

The trash compactors have helped beautify the area, said Gina Tleel, executive director for South Lake Business Association.

When Arizona State University began using the compactors, Refuse Coordinator Ted Woods doubted most students would use them.

"Boy, I had to eat my words, they work great," says Woods, who said the containers have reduced the daily trash pickup to once a week.

The university received six donated compactors from Pepsi in 2006 and added 10 units in 2008, said Bonny Bentzin, director of university sustainability practices.

The compactors were installed at Georgetown University in October 2009, says William del Vecchio, manager of recycling and solid waste disposal at the university.

"Personally, I'm glad to see the university continuing its push for sustainability efforts," said student Calen Angert, who uses the cans.

Student Nora White, who has used the bins on campus at Los Angeles Trade-Technical College, says they are a good reminder to recycle. "With them right beside each other, it puts it in your consciousness," she says.

Some states, including California, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Washington, got Department of Energy grants to purchase their solar-powered compactors.

Philadelphia used its grant to replace 700 litter baskets with 500 of the trash compactors and 210 sidewalk recycling cans in April 2009, Tollson says.

Not only have the containers helped with the green initiative, but they also reduced trash pickups from 17 times per week to five, she says.

As a result, employees have been reassigned where they are needed most.

"Philadelphia will save $13 million in cumulative collection over the next 10 years," Tollson says.

New York City received mixed results when it tested earlier models from February to March in 2005, says Vito Turso, the Department of Sanitation's deputy commissioner for public information and community affairs. He sees purchasing more wire mesh litter baskets, which cost $125 each, as a greater advantage.

Link to USA Today original post. Located on page 2A of print edition.

More courts swear by digital technology



Updated 3/16/2010 2:24 AM | Comments 14 | Recommend 8

Courts in Iowa, Minnesota and New York are considering replacing at least some court reporters with digital recording systems to cut costs.

If they do, they would follow Utah, Vermont, New Hampshire, Alaska and Kentucky in using electronic recording systems. Utah and Vermont switched exclusively for budget reasons in 2009, according to SueLynn Morgan, president of the National Court Reporters Association (NCRA), and officials in those states.

"The budget crisis since January 2009 is behind the push now," Morgan said.

Utah was the most recent state to go digital in July, laying off 18 court reporters, with expected savings of more than $1 million per year, courts spokeswoman Nancy Volmer said.

Among courts considering changes:

• Minnesota. A system called CourtSmart is being used in 15% to 20% of each day's hearings in Stearns County, Minn., according to District Court Judge Thomas Knapp, who helped implement the technology. "I don't think it's a step showing that we're going to ... eliminate court reporters," Knapp said. "We still need them."

The state's judicial council will make a decision in May or June about expanding the practice, said Jan Ballman, CEO of Paradigm Reporting & Captioning.

• Iowa. The judicial council is considering the change but has not set a time frame, said Steve Davis, spokesman for the Iowa Judicial Branch.

• New York. The Worker's Compensation Board is working on a pilot test to compare records produced by digital audio recording to those from court reporters, spokesman Brian Keegan said.

New Hampshire laid off all of its court reporters in 2005, said Laura Kiernan, state judicial branch communications director.

Alaska has used a recording system for more than 20 years, and Kentucky has exclusively used video recording since the 1980s, court officials in those states said.

Jim Cudahy, NCRA's senior director of marketing and communications, said the cost savings are largely perceived.

Although salaries can be higher or lower depending on the jurisdiction, Cudahy estimated that court reporters earn an average of $30,000 to $55,000 per year. In New Hampshire, court reporters earn $51,714 to $72,325, while court technology monitors earn between $31,983 to $44,561, Kiernan said.

Utah County Attorney Jeff Buhman said he thinks inaudible words could cause "a lot of the consequences" when there are appeals.

Link to USA Today original post. Located on page 3A of print edition.

Tight times put gravel on the road




Updated 2/4/2010 3:24 AM | Comments 70 | Recommend 13

Gravel roads, once a symbol of quaint times, are emerging as a sign of financial struggle in a growing number of rural towns.

High costs and tight budgets have prompted communities in Maine, Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Vermont to convert or consider converting their cracked asphalt roads back to gravel to cut maintenance costs, officials in those states say.

New technology allows asphalt to be recycled into a durable gravel-like surface that is cheaper to maintain and adequately prevents potholes and mud, said David Creamer, a field operations specialist at the Center for Dirt and Gravel Road Studies at Pennsylvania State University.

Thirty-eight counties in Michigan replaced a total of 100 miles of asphalt roads with gravel because of decreasing funds in 2008-09, said Monica Ware, a spokeswoman for the County Road Association of Michigan.

In Montcalm County, Mich., 10 miles were converted to cut patching costs in 2009, said Randy Stearns, managing director of the county's road commission. He cited one road that cost a combined $39,244 in 2008 and early 2009 for patching, but only $7,300 to crush into gravel. More roads may be converted this summer, he said.

A 2006 study by the University of Minnesota's Center for Transportation Studies found gravel is cost-effective when daily traffic averages 200 vehicles or less.

Even so, some have concerns.

"None of these decisions should be made overnight," said Chris Plaushin, director of federal relations at AAA. "I think that gravel brings some conditions that they may not be used to. The drivers are going to have to exert a little more caution."

Elsewhere:

• Hancock County, Ind. County engineer and superintendent Joe Copeland said budget cuts required 11 miles to be converted last year. "They are holding up well," he said. Copeland said about three more miles may be converted this year.

• Cranberry Isles, Maine. Town Selectman Richard Beal said high asphalt and transportation costs led him to support gravel. The town will decide March 8 whether to replace its three major roads, he said.

Resident Gaile Colby, who lives on one of the roads being considered, called it a terrible idea. "Have you ever lived on a gravel road? In the summer it's like clouds of (dirt) coming through your house," Colby said.

• Tuscarora State Forest, Pa. The Department of Forestry converted 3 miles to gravel in 2008 and 2009, Forest Program Manager Matthew Beaver said, and more could be converted this year.

Link to USA Today original post. Located on page 3A of print edition.


Blackburn's Life Lessons/How the Democrats Will Rule Another 40